|
Mack Mariani Summary of Student Evaluations Below is a summary of student evaluation results. The mid-semester evaluations from POS 120
(Fall 1999) and the end of semester evaluations from PSC 418 (Spring 2006)
were self-administered. All other
evaluations were conducted as part of the official college/university
evaluation process. Copies of the
original results, forms, and completed surveys are available upon request. |
|
Govt 208 –
Political Parties and Elections Spring 2006 |
||||||
|
N=32 |
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Somewhat Disagree |
Somewhat Agree |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
|
The
course challenged me intellectually |
0 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
17 |
9 |
|
The
instructor encouraged me to think |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
14 |
15 |
|
The
instructor communicated clearly and effectively |
0 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
10 |
19 |
|
The
instructor set high standards |
0 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
19 |
9 |
|
The
instructor was approachable and helpful |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
5 |
25 |
|
The
overall quality of the course was high |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
14 |
14 |
|
The
instructor was an effective teacher |
0 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
10 |
18 |
|
Govt 116 – American Political Process Spring 2006 |
||||||
|
N=36 |
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Somewhat Disagree |
Somewhat Agree |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
|
The
course challenged me intellectually |
0 |
0 |
4 |
8 |
15 |
9 |
|
The
instructor encouraged me to think |
0 |
0 |
2 |
9 |
11 |
15 |
|
The
instructor communicated clearly and effectively |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
14 |
19 |
|
The
instructor set high standards |
0 |
0 |
3 |
8 |
15 |
10 |
|
The
instructor was approachable and helpful |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
7 |
28 |
|
The
overall quality of the course was high |
0 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
11 |
19 |
|
The
instructor was an effective teacher |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
13 |
20 |
|
Govt 308 W – Politics, Persuasion, and Public
Opinion Spring 2006 |
||||||
|
N=23 |
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Somewhat Disagree |
Somewhat Agree |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
|
The
course challenged me intellectually |
1 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
9 |
8 |
|
The
instructor encouraged me to think |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
5 |
13 |
|
The
instructor communicated clearly and effectively |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
6 |
16 |
|
The
instructor set high standards |
0 |
1 |
0 |
4 |
10 |
8 |
|
The
instructor was approachable and helpful |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
3 |
19 |
|
The
overall quality of the course was high |
0 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
7 |
13 |
|
The
instructor was an effective teacher |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
4 |
17 |
|
Govt 334 W – Congress and the Presidency Fall 2005 Note: The low enrollment in this course is due to the fact that the
course was not added to the schedule until after I was hired in mid-summer. I
ended up running the course as a seminar.. |
||||||
|
N=6 |
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Somewhat Disagree |
Somewhat Agree |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
|
The
course challenged me intellectually |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
2 |
|
The
instructor encouraged me to think |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
2 |
|
The
instructor communicated clearly and effectively |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
4 |
|
The
instructor set high standards |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
1 |
|
The
instructor was approachable and helpful |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
|
The
overall quality of the course was high |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
2 |
|
The
instructor was an effective teacher |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
4 |
|
Govt 116 – American Political Process Fall 2005 |
||||||
|
N=40 |
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Somewhat Disagree |
Somewhat Agree |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
|
The
course challenged me intellectually |
1 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
27 |
6 |
|
The
instructor encouraged me to think |
0 |
1 |
1 |
4 |
15 |
19 |
|
The
instructor communicated clearly and effectively |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
15 |
23 |
|
The
instructor set high standards |
0 |
1 |
0 |
7 |
18 |
14 |
|
The
instructor was approachable and helpful |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
7 |
31 |
|
The
overall quality of the course was high |
1 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
17 |
19 |
|
The
instructor was an effective teacher |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
13 |
24 |
|
PSC 418 - Public
Administration Spring 2006 Note: the results below are selected responses from a longer,
self-administered survey. Because I
was teaching a night course and the college did not send me the usual
evaluation forms in time for the last day of classes, I used the English
Department’s (rather lengthy) evaluation form as a substitute. Copies of the originals are available by
request. |
||||||
|
N=11 |
A |
B |
C |
D |
E |
|
|
Were
the objectives of the course clear (A=Unclear, E=Clear) |
0 |
0 |
3 |
3 |
5 |
|
|
The
amount of work required was appropriate to the nature and level of the course
(A=Strongly disagree, C=Agree, E = Strongly Agree) |
1 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
|
|
How
would you evaluate the text/assigned readings in terms of the objectives of
the course (A=actually detrimental, E=very appropriate) |
2 |
4 |
4 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
How
would you evaluate the difficulty o these readings in relation to what you
got out of them (A=Too elementary, E=Too advanced) |
0 |
1 |
3 |
4 |
3 |
|
|
Degree
to which the course hung together (topics and activities were related to each
other). (A=Much less than most, C= About average, E=Much more than most) |
0 |
0 |
3 |
6 |
2 |
|
|
Considering
the above, how would you rate this course (A=poor, B=Fair, C=Good, D=Very
good, E=Excellent) |
0 |
3 |
1 |
6 |
1 |
|
|
How
helpful is the teacher when students have difficulty (A=not helpful,
E=actively helpful) |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
8 |
|
|
Does
the teacher make students feel free to ask questions, disagree, express their
ideas, etc…? (A=intolerant,
E=encourages student ideas) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
9 |
|
|
Does
the teacher present material in a clear, well-organized fashion?
(A=disorganized and/or unclear, E=well organized and clear) |
0 |
0 |
2 |
4 |
5 |
|
|
Does
the teacher stimulate thought (A=seldom, C=occasionally, E=Usually) |
0 |
0 |
1 |
6 |
4 |
|
|
Considering
everything, how would you rate this teacher’s overall performance? (A=poor, B=fair, C=good, D=very good,
E=excellent) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
8 |
|
|
PSC 201 –
Introduction to Political Science Fall 2005; End of
Semester Evaluation (selected responses) |
|||||
|
N=21 |
Not at all |
Very little |
Some-what |
Mostly |
Completely |
|
Course
objectives and expectations, assignments, grading standards made clear in the
syllabus and by the instructor |
0 |
0 |
1 |
7 |
13 |
|
The
instructor demonstrated an appropriate knowledge of the subject matter |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
13 |
|
The
instructor utilized class time effectively |
0 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
15 |
|
The
instructor encourages student involvement and participation |
0 |
1 |
0 |
3 |
17 |
|
The
instructor creates a class environment that encourages learning |
0 |
1 |
1 |
4 |
15 |
|
The
instructor treats students and their questions and opinions with respect |
0 |
0 |
2 |
4 |
15 |
|
The
instructor taught the subject matter specified for this course |
0 |
0 |
2 |
5 |
14 |
|
The
instructor made it clear why it was important to learn the subject matter |
0 |
2 |
2 |
8 |
9 |
|
The
instructor uses a balance of teaching techniques (discussion groups,
assignments, lectures, et.c.) that contribute to
understanding the subject. |
0 |
0 |
7 |
2 |
12 |
|
The
course assignments are appropriate and contribute to understanding the
subject |
0 |
0 |
2 |
11 |
8 |
|
The
course materials are appropriate and contribute to understanding the subject |
0 |
1 |
4 |
6 |
10 |
|
The
content and difficulty of the reading materials and other resources used in
this class are appropriate to this subject. |
0 |
1 |
7 |
7 |
6 |
|
Tests
and assessments reflect the main concepts of this course |
0 |
0 |
1 |
8 |
12 |
|
My
grades for this course accurately reflect my performance |
0 |
0 |
5 |
9 |
7 |
|
I have
received useful feedback on my graded assignments |
0 |
0 |
3 |
6 |
12 |
|
There
are sufficient tests and graded assignments by which to fairly evaluate my
understanding of the subject |
0 |
0 |
5 |
9 |
7 |
|
My
expectations for this course are substantially met |
0 |
3 |
2 |
10 |
6 |
|
I
would enjoy taking another course from this instructor |
1 |
2 |
0 |
7 |
11 |
PSC 121 -
Introduction to American National Government Fall 2000
(Instructor); Mid-Semester Evaluation |
|||||
|
N=17 |
Almost Never |
Rarely |
Sometimes |
Often |
Almost Always |
|
Well
prepared for class |
0 |
0 |
1 |
7 |
9 |
|
Answered
questions effectively |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
12 |
|
Was
clear and understandable |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
11 |
|
Stimulated
student interest in the subject |
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
13 |
|
Treated
students with respect |
0 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
13 |
|
Was
accessible to students outside class |
0 |
2 |
1 |
5 |
8 |
|
Encouraged
student participation |
0 |
0 |
3 |
1 |
13 |
|
Returned
exams, papers or projects promptly |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
12 |
|
Provided
helpful feedback on graded exams, papers or projects promptly |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
10 |
|
Used
clear and understandable grading procedures |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
17 |
|
Used a
variety of classroom activities to add interest to the course |
0 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
9 |
|
Was
responsive to the needs of the adult part-time student |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
11 |
|
PSC 305 – Congress
and the Legislative Process Summer 2000
(Instructor); Mid-Course Evaluation |
|||||
|
N=9 |
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
|
Instructor presented clear
syllabus |
1 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
0 |
|
Expectations
were clearly outlined |
1 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
0 |
|
Course
progressed coherently |
1 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
0 |
|
Exams
were fair test of materials |
1 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
0 |
|
Exams
and assignments were graded fairly |
1 |
0 |
2 |
6 |
0 |
|
Graded
materials were returned timely |
1 |
0 |
1 |
7 |
0 |
|
Instructor
prepared for classes |
1 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
0 |
|
Instructor’s
knowledge of material |
1 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
0 |
|
Instructor
presented materials clearly |
1 |
0 |
1 |
7 |
0 |
|
Instructor
open to questions |
1 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
0 |
|
Instructor
respected differing views |
1 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
0 |
|
Instructor
encouraged good discussion |
1 |
0 |
1 |
7 |
0 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
0 |
|
Relevance
of readings made clear |
1 |
0 |
1 |
6 |
0 |
|
|
1 |
0 |
2 |
5 |
0 |
|
Assignments
contributed to understanding |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
0 |
|
Too
much reading for the course |
1 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
|
Course
was challenging |
0 |
1 |
2 |
6 |
0 |
|
Demands
were excessive for what I learned |
4 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
Course
stimulated my interest in subject |
0 |
0 |
1 |
8 |
0 |
|
I learned analytic
skills |
0 |
0 |
4 |
5 |
0 |
|
Encouraged my own
analyses and views |
0 |
0 |
2 |
7 |
0 |
PSC 202 – Political
Argument and Reasoning Spring 2000 (Team
Taught); Mid-Semester Evaluation |
|||||
|
N=16 |
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
N/A |
|
Instructor presented clear
syllabus |
0 |
0 |
5 |
11 |
0 |
|
Expectations
were clearly outlined |
0 |
0 |
3 |
13 |
0 |
|
Course
progressed coherently |
0 |
1 |
3 |
12 |
0 |
|
Exams
were fair test of materials |
0 |
0 |
5 |
11 |
0 |
|
Exams
and assignments were graded fairly |
0 |
0 |
3 |
12 |
1 |
|
Graded
materials were returned timely |
0 |
0 |
3 |
12 |
1 |
|
Instructor
prepared for classes |
0 |
0 |
2 |
14 |
0 |
|
Instructor’s
knowledge of material |
0 |
0 |
6 |
10 |
0 |
|
Instructor
presented materials clearly |
0 |
1 |
2 |
13 |
0 |
|
Instructor
open to questions |
0 |
0 |
1 |
15 |
0 |
|
Instructor
respected differing views |
0 |
0 |
1 |
15 |
0 |
|
Instructor
encouraged good discussion |
0 |
0 |
1 |
14 |
1 |
|
|
0 |
3 |
8 |
3 |
0 |
|
Relevance
of readings made clear |
0 |
0 |
10 |
6 |
0 |
|
|
1 |
3 |
10 |
2 |
0 |
|
Assignments
contributed to understanding |
0 |
0 |
11 |
5 |
0 |
|
Too
much reading for the course |
1 |
9 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
|
Course
was challenging |
0 |
3 |
10 |
2 |
1 |
|
Demands
were excessive for what I learned |
3 |
12 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
Course
stimulated my interest in subject |
0 |
0 |
9 |
7 |
0 |
|
I learned analytic
skills |
0 |
0 |
8 |
8 |
0 |
|
Encouraged my own analyses
and views |
0 |
0 |
8 |
8 |
0 |
|
PSC 121 -
Introduction to American Government Fall 1999
(Mid-Semester Evaluation) * This table includes the
combined results from sections 001 and 003. Copies of the original results
are available by request. |
||||||
|
N=40 |
Strongly
Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly
Agree |
N/A |
|
prepares well for class |
1 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
31 |
0 |
|
makes oral presentations
clearly |
1 |
0 |
1 |
8 |
30 |
0 |
|
presents material in an
organized fashion |
1 |
0 |
1 |
12 |
26 |
0 |
|
encourages questions |
1 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
32 |
0 |
|
responds well to questions |
1 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
28 |
0 |
|
provides helpful feedback on
course assignments |
1 |
0 |
1 |
9 |
29 |
0 |
|
shows concern that you are
learning the material |
1 |
0
|
2 |
9 |
28 |
0 |
|
makes him/herself available
outside of class |
1 |
0 |
2 |
9 |
27 |
1
|
|
demonstrates knowledge of the
subject matter |
1 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
30 |
0 |
|
presents new material in an
understandable way |
1 |
0 |
1 |
16 |
22 |
0 |
|
willingness to help students
having difficulty |
1 |
0 |
2 |
12 |
25 |
0 |
|
communicates concepts, content
and issues clearly |
1 |
0 |
1 |
12 |
26 |
0 |
|
is approachable about course
related questions |
1 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
24 |
0 |
|
shows enthusiasm for the
subject and teaching |
1 |
0 |
1 |
7 |
31
|
0 |
|
POS 120 - American
National Government Fall 1999
(Instructor); End of Semester Evaluation |
|||||
|
N=16 |
No Response |
N/A |
Disagree |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
|
Makes
clear what is expected |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
12 |
|
Assignments
clearly related to content |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
9 |
|
Presentations
clear and understandable |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
7 |
|
Feel
free to ask questions in class |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
11 |
|
Answers
questions effectively |
1 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
10 |
|
Tolerant
of other viewpoints/dissenting opinions |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
14 |
|
Knows
the subject matter |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
13 |
|
Stimulates
interest in subject matter |
0 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
10 |
|
Well
prepared for class |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
12 |
|
Available
for help outside of class |
1 |
2 |
0 |
7 |
6 |
|
Lectures
and work assigned are related |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
11 |
|
Grades
assignments carefully |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
13 |
|
Returns
assignments in timely manner |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
11 |
|
Increased
your awareness of concepts and principles in the field |
0 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
10 |
|
You
found course to be valuable and relevant to future plans |
0 |
0 |
1 |
6 |
9 |
|
You
enjoyed class and would recommend |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
10 |
|
Explains
grading criteria clearly |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
9 |
|
You
would recommend instructor to other students |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
13 |
|
POS 120 – American
National Government Fall 1999
(Mid-Semester Evaluation) * For the purposes of
consistency, I used the Syracuse University Mid-Course evaluation to gauge my
progress in POS 120 at |
||||||
|
N=19 |
Strongly
Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly
Agree |
N/A |
|
prepares well for class |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
12 |
0 |
|
makes oral presentations clearly |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
9 |
0 |
|
presents material in an organized fashion |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
11 |
0 |
|
encourages questions |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
12 |
0 |
|
responds well to questions |
0 |
0 |
1 |
8 |
10 |
0 |
|
provides helpful feedback on course assignments |
0 |
0 |
1 |
9 |
9 |
0 |
|
shows concern that you are learning the material |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
12 |
0 |
|
makes him/herself available outside of class |
0 |
0 |
2 |
7 |
7 |
2 |
|
demonstrates knowledge of the subject matter |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
13 |
0 |
|
presents new material in an understandable way |
0 |
0 |
1 |
11 |
7 |
0 |
|
shows a willingness to help students having
difficulty |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
8 |
1 |
|
communicates concepts, content and issues clearly |
0 |
0 |
1 |
9 |
7 |
1 |
|
is approachable about course related questions |
0 |
0 |
1 |
7 |
9 |
1 |
|
shows enthusiasm for the subject and teaching |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
12 |
1 |
|
PSC 121 -
Introduction to American Government Fall 1998
(Mid-Semester Evaluation) * This table includes the
combined results from sections 002 and 003. Copies of the original results
are available by request. |
||||||
|
N=34 |
Strongly
Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly
Agree |
N/A |
|
prepares well for class |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
29 |
0 |
|
makes oral presentations clearly |
0 |
0 |
1
|
6 |
27 |
0
|
|
presents material in an organized fashion |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
25 |
0 |
|
encourages questions |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
30 |
0 |
|
responds well to questions |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
28 |
0 |
|
provides helpful feedback on course assignments |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
28 |
0 |
|
shows concern that you are learning the material |
0 |
0 |
1 |
8 |
25 |
0 |
|
makes him/herself available outside of class |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
28 |
0 |
|
demonstrates knowledge of the subject matter |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
30 |
0 |
|
presents new material in an understandable way |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
27 |
0 |
|
shows a willingness to help students having
difficulty |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
31 |
0 |
|
communicates concepts, content and issues clearly |
0 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
29 |
0 |
|
is approachable about course related questions |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
29 |
0 |
|
shows enthusiasm for the subject and teaching |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
32 |
0 |
|
PSC 497 –
Federalists and Anti-Federalists Seminar Spring 1998 (Interim
Instructor) |
|||||
|
N=9 |
E=Poor |
D |
C |
B |
A=Excellent |
|
The instructor arouses interest in subject |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
6 |
|
The instructor presents ideas and concepts
clearly |
0 |
0 |
2 |
4 |
3 |
|
The instructor opens new perspectives |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
5 |
|
The instructor encourages students to question,
disagree, and express their views |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
8 |
|
The instructor provides individual help when
sought |
0 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
3 |
|
The instructor integrates lectures, readings,
assignments and examinations |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
6 |
|
The instructor encourages and stimulates thinking |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
6 |
|
The instructor is prepared for class |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
5 |
|
The instructor gives worthwhile assignments |
0 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
3 |
|
The instructor gives fair tests |
0 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
4 |
|
I would judge this instructor’s overall teaching
effectiveness to be |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
4 |
|
My overall evaluation of this course is |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
5 |
|
PSC 121 -
Introduction to American Government Spring 1998 * This table includes the
combined results for Sections 105 and 106. Copies of the original results are
available by request. |
||||||
|
N=34 |
Strongly
Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly
Agree |
N/A |
|
prepares well for class |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
27 |
0 |
|
makes oral presentations clearly |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
26 |
0 |
|
presents material in an organized fashion |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
25 |
0 |
|
encourages questions |
1 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
27 |
0 |
|
responds well to questions |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
27 |
0 |
|
provides helpful feedback on course assignments |
1 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
24 |
1 |
|
shows concern that you are learning the material |
1 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
26 |
0 |
|
makes him/herself available outside of class |
1 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
29 |
0 |
|
demonstrates knowledge of the subject matter |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
28 |
0 |
|
presents new material in an understandable way |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
24 |
0 |
|
willingness to help students having difficulty |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
28 |
0 |
|
communicates concepts, content & issues
clearly |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
26 |
0 |
|
is approachable about course related questions |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
28 |
0 |
|
shows enthusiasm for the subject and teaching |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
30 |
0 |
|
PSC 121 -
Introduction to American Government Fall 1997 * This table includes the
combined results for Sections 102 and 106. One student’s response was
improperly entered. It has been re-coded for the purposes of this table.
Copies of the original results are available by request. |
||||||
|
N=37 |
Strongly
Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly
Agree |
N/A |
|
prepares well for class |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
27
|
0 |
|
makes oral presentations clearly |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
29 |
0 |
|
presents material in an organized fashion |
0 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
26
|
0 |
|
encourages questions |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
31
|
0 |
|
responds well to questions |
0 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
26
|
0 |
|
provides helpful feedback on course assignments |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
28
|
0 |
|
shows concern that you are learning the material |
0 |
0
|
1 |
10
|
26
|
0 |
|
makes him/herself available outside of class |
0 |
0 |
2
|
12
|
20 |
2
|
|
demonstrates knowledge of the subject matter |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
29
|
0 |
|
presents new material in an understandable way |
0 |
0 |
0 |
14
|
23
|
0 |
|
willingness to help students having difficulty |
0 |
0 |
1 |
12
|
23 |
1
|
|
communicates concepts, content & issues
clearly |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
27 |
0
|
|
is approachable about course related questions |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
27 |
0 |
|
shows enthusiasm for the subject and teaching |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
27 |
0
|